lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:07:21 +0800
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...hat.com>,
        Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@...l.gov>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, peterx@...hat.com,
        Martin Cracauer <cracauer@...s.org>,
        Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@...tuozzo.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@...l.gov>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/1] userfaultfd: allow to forbid unprivileged users

Hi,

This is the second version of the work.  V1 was here:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/11/207

I removed CC to kvm list since not necessary any more, but added
linux-api to the list as suggested by Kirill.

This one greatly simplifies the previous version, dropped the kvm
special entry and mimic the sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled knob for
userfaultfd as suggested by many.  The major differences comparing to
the BPF flag are: (1) use PTRACE instead of ADMIN capability, and (2)
allow to switch the flag back and forth (BPF does not allow to switch
back to "enabled" if "disabled" once).

So the main idea of this simpler version is that we still keep the old
way as is by default but we only provide a way for admins when they
really want to turn userfaultfd off for unprivileged users.

About procfs vs sysfs: I still used the procfs way because admins can
still leverage sysctl.conf with that and also since no one yet
explicitly asked for sysfs for a better reason yet (And I just noticed
BPF just added another bpf_stats_enabled into sysctl a few weeks ago).

Please have a look, thanks.

Peter Xu (1):
  userfaultfd/sysctl: add vm.unprivileged_userfaultfd

 Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt   | 12 ++++++++++++
 fs/userfaultfd.c              |  5 +++++
 include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h |  2 ++
 kernel/sysctl.c               | 12 ++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+)

-- 
2.17.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ