linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] tpm: fix an invalid condition in tpm_common

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <155302749437.13955.651380639754310898.stgit@tstruk-mobl1.jf.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:31:34 -0700
From:   Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>
To:     jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     grawity@...il.com, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tadeusz.struk@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] tpm: fix an invalid condition in tpm_common_poll

The poll condition should only check response_length,
because reads should only be issued if there is data to read.
The response_read flag only prevents double writes.
The problem was that the write set the response_read to false,
enqued a tpm job, and returned. Then application called poll
which checked the response_read flag and returned EPOLLIN.
Then the application called read, but got nothing.
After all that the async_work kicked in.
Added also mutex_lock around the poll check to prevent
other possible race conditions.

Fixes: 9488585b21bef0df12 ("tpm: add support for partial reads")
Reported-by: Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
index 5eecad233ea1..7312d3214381 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
@@ -203,12 +203,14 @@ __poll_t tpm_common_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
 	__poll_t mask = 0;
 
 	poll_wait(file, &priv->async_wait, wait);
+	mutex_lock(&priv->buffer_mutex);
 
-	if (!priv->response_read || priv->response_length)
+	if (priv->response_length)
 		mask = EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
 	else
 		mask = EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM;
 
+	mutex_unlock(&priv->buffer_mutex);
 	return mask;
 }