linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] Provide in-kernel headers to make extending kernel easier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190320194218.GA80310@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:42:18 -0400
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qais.yousef@....com,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, linux@...ojrajarao.com, ast@...nel.org,
        atishp04@...il.com, dancol@...gle.com,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, karim.yaghmour@...rsys.com,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        mhiramat@...nel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, yhs@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] Provide in-kernel headers to make extending
 kernel easier

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:31:11AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:31:14 -0400 "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
> 
> > Introduce in-kernel headers and other artifacts which are made available
> > as an archive through proc (/proc/kheaders.tar.xz file).
> 
> Lazyass here hasn't been following the recent review discussion and is
> going to try cheating.  Are there significant outstanding concerns now,
> or are we good to go?

Looks to me like it is pretty solid. v4->v5 was just cosmetic changes,
rebasing etc. Unless Masahiro has any other concerns, it could be a
linux-next candidate. I tested it quite heavily, but would be nice to get
some linux-next testing as well.

thanks,

 - Joel