[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdkekJw-wLn=9K=xKE0X260MZCCRtD1r5Erp=fQTwn+p9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:41:03 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com, eddie.wai@...adcom.com,
huangjw@...adcom.com, prashant@...adcom.com, mchan@...adcom.com,
vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: -Wsometimes-uninitialized Clang warning in drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+ Broadcom folks from commit c0c050c58d84 ("bnxt_en: New Broadcom
ethernet driver."). Looks like Michael wrote and is still maintaining
the driver.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:08 PM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:57:35PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We are trying to get Clang's -Wsometimes-uninitialized turned on for the
> > kernel as it can catch some bugs that GCC can't. This warning came up:
> >
> > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:1612:6: warning: variable 'len' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> > if (rxcmp1->rx_cmp_cfa_code_errors_v2 & RX_CMP_L2_ERRORS) {
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:1703:19: note: uninitialized use occurs here
> > cpr->rx_bytes += len;
> > ^~~
> > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:1612:2: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always false
> > if (rxcmp1->rx_cmp_cfa_code_errors_v2 & RX_CMP_L2_ERRORS) {
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:1540:18: note: initialize the variable 'len' to silence this warning
> > unsigned int len;
> > ^
> > = 0
> > 1 warning generated.
> >
> > It seems like the logical change to make is this; however, I am not sure
> > if this has any other unintended consequences since this is a rather
> > dense function. I would much appreciate your input, especially if there
> > is a better way to fix it.
I agree that `goto next_rx_no_prod_no_len` appears to be most correct;
though I don't understand why this function is a mix of early return
codes, vs setting rc then updating *raw_cons. The alternative is
probably zero initializing len, but I'm not sure whether *raw_cons
should be updated in that case or not. Thanks for bringing this up
and the patch. Sorry for the delay in review. Can folks at Broadcom
please clarify?
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists