lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8HKUQPr7TaUm7EwdVFasUitAPBJFotpG43nNAKMBvxdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Mar 2019 23:02:09 +0100
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To:     Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Marcin Benka <mbenka@...vell.com>,
        "linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] efi: Unify dmi setup code over architectures
 arm/arm64, io64 and x86

On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 16:23, Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com> wrote:
>
> On 20.03.19 14:16:07, Robert Richter wrote:
> > On 20.03.19 13:05:37, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ static int __init arm_dmi_init(void)
> > >      * itself, depends on dmi_scan_machine() having been called already.
> > >      */
> > >     dmi_scan_machine();
> > > +   dmi_memdev_walk();
> > >     if (dmi_available)
> > >             dmi_set_dump_stack_arch_desc();
> > >     return 0;
> >
> > After
> >
> >  [PATCH] efi/arm: Show SMBIOS bank/device location in cper and
> >   ghes error logs
> >
> > wents in for arm/arm64, we can unify the code. See patch below.
>
> V2 with the fix in arm_dmi_init() below.
>
> -Robert
>
>
> -- >8 --
> From: Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] efi: Unify dmi setup code over architectures arm/arm64,
>  io64 and x86
>
> All architectures (arm/arm64, io64 and x86) do the same here, so unify
> the code.
>
> Note: We do not need to call dump_stack_set_arch_desc() in case of
> !dmi_available. Both strings, dmi_ids_string and dump_stack_arch_
> desc_str are initialized zero and thus nothing would change.
>

I don't understand the last sentence - we do not need to call
dump_stack_set_arch_desc() when !dmi_available, but we do so anyway,
right? Doesn't that wipe the arch description we set based on the DT
machine name?

> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>
> ---
>  arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c           |  4 +---
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c            |  6 ++----
>  drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c        | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c |  7 ++-----
>  include/linux/dmi.h                |  8 ++------
>  5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
> index 583a3746d70b..c9cfa760cd57 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -1058,9 +1058,7 @@ check_bugs (void)
>
>  static int __init run_dmi_scan(void)
>  {
> -       dmi_scan_machine();
> -       dmi_memdev_walk();
> -       dmi_set_dump_stack_arch_desc();
> +       dmi_setup();
>         return 0;
>  }
>  core_initcall(run_dmi_scan);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index 3d872a527cd9..3773905cd2c1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -1005,13 +1005,11 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>         if (efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT))
>                 efi_init();
>
> -       dmi_scan_machine();
> -       dmi_memdev_walk();
> -       dmi_set_dump_stack_arch_desc();
> +       dmi_setup();
>
>         /*
>          * VMware detection requires dmi to be available, so this
> -        * needs to be done after dmi_scan_machine(), for the boot CPU.
> +        * needs to be done after dmi_setup(), for the boot CPU.
>          */
>         init_hypervisor_platform();
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c b/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
> index 099d83e4e910..fae2d5c43314 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
> @@ -416,11 +416,8 @@ static void __init save_mem_devices(const struct dmi_header *dm, void *v)
>         nr++;
>  }
>
> -void __init dmi_memdev_walk(void)
> +static void __init dmi_memdev_walk(void)
>  {
> -       if (!dmi_available)
> -               return;
> -
>         if (dmi_walk_early(count_mem_devices) == 0 && dmi_memdev_nr) {
>                 dmi_memdev = dmi_alloc(sizeof(*dmi_memdev) * dmi_memdev_nr);
>                 if (dmi_memdev)
> @@ -614,7 +611,7 @@ static int __init dmi_smbios3_present(const u8 *buf)
>         return 1;
>  }
>
> -void __init dmi_scan_machine(void)
> +static void __init dmi_scan_machine(void)
>  {
>         char __iomem *p, *q;
>         char buf[32];
> @@ -769,15 +766,20 @@ static int __init dmi_init(void)
>  subsys_initcall(dmi_init);
>
>  /**
> - * dmi_set_dump_stack_arch_desc - set arch description for dump_stack()
> + *     dmi_setup - scan and setup DMI system information
>   *
> - * Invoke dump_stack_set_arch_desc() with DMI system information so that
> - * DMI identifiers are printed out on task dumps.  Arch boot code should
> - * call this function after dmi_scan_machine() if it wants to print out DMI
> - * identifiers on task dumps.
> + *     Scan the DMI system information. This setups DMI identifiers
> + *     (dmi_system_id) for printing it out on task dumps and prepares
> + *     DIMM entry information (dmi_memdev_info) from the SMBIOS table
> + *     for using this when reporting memory errors.
>   */
> -void __init dmi_set_dump_stack_arch_desc(void)
> +void __init dmi_setup(void)
>  {
> +       dmi_scan_machine();
> +       if (!dmi_available)
> +               return;
> +
> +       dmi_memdev_walk();
>         dump_stack_set_arch_desc("%s", dmi_ids_string);
>  }
>
> @@ -841,7 +843,7 @@ static bool dmi_is_end_of_table(const struct dmi_system_id *dmi)
>   *     returns non zero or we hit the end. Callback function is called for
>   *     each successful match. Returns the number of matches.
>   *
> - *     dmi_scan_machine must be called before this function is called.
> + *     dmi_setup must be called before this function is called.
>   */
>  int dmi_check_system(const struct dmi_system_id *list)
>  {
> @@ -871,7 +873,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dmi_check_system);
>   *     Walk the blacklist table until the first match is found.  Return the
>   *     pointer to the matching entry or NULL if there's no match.
>   *
> - *     dmi_scan_machine must be called before this function is called.
> + *     dmi_setup must be called before this function is called.
>   */
>  const struct dmi_system_id *dmi_first_match(const struct dmi_system_id *list)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
> index 4a0dfe4ab829..e2ac5fa5531b 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
> @@ -162,14 +162,11 @@ void efi_virtmap_unload(void)
>  static int __init arm_dmi_init(void)
>  {
>         /*
> -        * On arm64/ARM, DMI depends on UEFI, and dmi_scan_machine() needs to
> +        * On arm64/ARM, DMI depends on UEFI, and dmi_setup() needs to
>          * be called early because dmi_id_init(), which is an arch_initcall
>          * itself, depends on dmi_scan_machine() having been called already.
>          */
> -       dmi_scan_machine();
> -       dmi_memdev_walk();
> -       if (dmi_available)
> -               dmi_set_dump_stack_arch_desc();
> +       dmi_setup();
>         return 0;
>  }
>  core_initcall(arm_dmi_init);
> diff --git a/include/linux/dmi.h b/include/linux/dmi.h
> index c46fdb36700b..8de8c4f15163 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dmi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dmi.h
> @@ -102,9 +102,7 @@ const struct dmi_system_id *dmi_first_match(const struct dmi_system_id *list);
>  extern const char * dmi_get_system_info(int field);
>  extern const struct dmi_device * dmi_find_device(int type, const char *name,
>         const struct dmi_device *from);
> -extern void dmi_scan_machine(void);
> -extern void dmi_memdev_walk(void);
> -extern void dmi_set_dump_stack_arch_desc(void);
> +extern void dmi_setup(void);
>  extern bool dmi_get_date(int field, int *yearp, int *monthp, int *dayp);
>  extern int dmi_get_bios_year(void);
>  extern int dmi_name_in_vendors(const char *str);
> @@ -122,9 +120,7 @@ static inline int dmi_check_system(const struct dmi_system_id *list) { return 0;
>  static inline const char * dmi_get_system_info(int field) { return NULL; }
>  static inline const struct dmi_device * dmi_find_device(int type, const char *name,
>         const struct dmi_device *from) { return NULL; }
> -static inline void dmi_scan_machine(void) { return; }
> -static inline void dmi_memdev_walk(void) { }
> -static inline void dmi_set_dump_stack_arch_desc(void) { }
> +static inline void dmi_setup(void) { }
>  static inline bool dmi_get_date(int field, int *yearp, int *monthp, int *dayp)
>  {
>         if (yearp)
> --
> 2.20.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ