linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: cfi_util: mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e4ab787c-1112-5088-7afc-911f33509ed5@embeddedor.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:36:16 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: cfi_util: mark expected switch fall-throughs



On 3/20/19 6:25 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. März 2019, 22:23:21 CET schrieb Gustavo A. R. Silva:
>> So, if this is too much of a burden for people, I can add all these
>> MTD patches to my own tree for 5.2.
> 
> Taking the patches via MTD is not a big deal, let's go that path.

Cool.

> For you it is more work to send many patches and getting them into the individual
> trees. :)
> 

Here applies this wise phrase: It is what it is. :)

Thanks
--
Gustavo