[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01000169988e707d-e6a091d6-b04f-4774-89b0-61f985885ac8-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:44:25 +0000
From: Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] mm, sl[aou]b: test whether kmalloc() alignment works
as expected
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Quick and dirty init test that kmalloc() alignment works as expected for
> power-of-two sizes after the previous patch.
There is already an allocator testing function in mm/slub.c. Can you
generalize it or portions and put the into mm/slab_common.c?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists