lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63518f1f-b808-77b0-aac6-ee1ece669c4b@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Mar 2019 09:37:09 +0000
From:   "Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>
CC:     "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
        "Zhou, David(ChunMing)" <David1.Zhou@....com>,
        "amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com" 
        <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Clang warning in drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c

Am 20.03.19 um 05:34 schrieb Nathan Chancellor:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 01:31:27AM +0000, Pan, Xinhui wrote:
>> these two enumerated types are same for now. both of them might change in the future.
>>
>> I have not used clang, but would  .block_id =  (int)head->block fix your warning? If such change is acceptable, I can make one then.
>>
>> Thanks
>> xinhui
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
>> Sent: 2019年3月20日 8:54
>> To: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@....com>; Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@....com>; Zhou, David(ChunMing) <David1.Zhou@....com>; Pan, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@....com>
>> Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
>> Subject: Clang warning in drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The introduction of this file in commit dbd249c24427 ("drm/amdgpu: add amdgpu_ras.c to support ras (v2)") introduces the following Clang
>> warnings:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:544:23: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'enum amdgpu_ras_block' to different enumeration type 'enum ta_ras_block' [-Wenum-conversion]
>>                          .block_id =  head->block,
>>                                       ~~~~~~^~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:545:24: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'enum amdgpu_ras_error_type' to different enumeration type 'enum ta_ras_error_type' [-Wenum-conversion]
>>                          .error_type = head->type,
>>                                        ~~~~~~^~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:549:23: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'enum amdgpu_ras_block' to different enumeration type 'enum ta_ras_block' [-Wenum-conversion]
>>                          .block_id =  head->block,
>>                                       ~~~~~~^~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:550:24: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'enum amdgpu_ras_error_type' to different enumeration type 'enum ta_ras_error_type' [-Wenum-conversion]
>>                          .error_type = head->type,
>>                                        ~~~~~~^~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:650:26: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'enum amdgpu_ras_block' to different enumeration type 'enum ta_ras_block' [-Wenum-conversion]
>>                  .block_id = info->head.block,
>>                              ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:651:35: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'enum amdgpu_ras_error_type' to different enumeration type 'enum ta_ras_error_type' [-Wenum-conversion]
>>                  .inject_error_type = info->head.type,
>>                                       ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
>> 6 warnings generated.
>>
>> Normally, I would sent a fix for this myself but I am not entirely sure why these two enumerated types exist when one would do since they have the same values minus the prefix. In fact, the ta_ras_{block,error_type} values are never used aside from being defined. Some clarification would be appreciated.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Nathan
> Hi Xinhui,
>
> Yes, explicitly casting these six spots to int would resolve this
> warning.

Another question is if it is such a good idea to just silence the warning?

Maybe add a amdgpu_ras_error_to_ta() helper to do this casting?

When the enums drift away from each other then we can still add warnings 
to that helper to make sure we don't accidentally cast invalid values 
around.

Regards,
Christian.

>
> Thank you for the quick response!
> Nathan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ