[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aab926e8-61a3-2fc8-6f8c-d64db133f167@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 08:55:22 +0800
From: "Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>" <suyj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+59752237f7ab21c3f3c3@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in xfrm_alloc_userspi
On 2019/3/20 0:23, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> CC Su Yanjun
>
> On 03/19/2019 09:02 AM, syzbot wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> syzbot found the following crash on:
>>
>> HEAD commit: b9998194 Add linux-next specific files for 20190318
>> git tree: linux-next
>> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17a2e24d200000
>> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=59cd5d43b5df6955
>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=59752237f7ab21c3f3c3
>> compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
>> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=14e70cb3200000
>> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=17292127200000
>>
>> IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
>> Reported-by: syzbot+59752237f7ab21c3f3c3@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>>
>> =============================
>> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
>> 5.1.0-rc1-next-20190318 #5 Not tainted
>> -----------------------------
>> net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1080 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>>
>> other info that might help us debug this:
>>
>>
>> rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
>> 1 lock held by syz-executor085/7946:
>> #0: 00000000a55031b5 (&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex){+.+.}, at: xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x61/0x90 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:2691
>>
>> stack backtrace:
>> CPU: 0 PID: 7946 Comm: syz-executor085 Not tainted 5.1.0-rc1-next-20190318 #5
>> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
>> Call Trace:
>> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
>> dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
>> lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x153/0x15d kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5162
>> xfrm_nlmsg_unicast net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1080 [inline]
>> xfrm_alloc_userspi+0x7d5/0xa80 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1356
>> xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x458/0x770 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:2684
>> netlink_rcv_skb+0x17a/0x460 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2485
>> xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x70/0x90 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:2692
>> netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1310 [inline]
>> netlink_unicast+0x536/0x720 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1336
>> netlink_sendmsg+0x8ae/0xd70 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1925
>> sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:651 [inline]
>> sock_sendmsg+0xdd/0x130 net/socket.c:661
>> ___sys_sendmsg+0x806/0x930 net/socket.c:2260
>> __sys_sendmsg+0x105/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2298
>> __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2307 [inline]
>> __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2305 [inline]
>> __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x78/0xb0 net/socket.c:2305
>> do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>> RIP: 0033:0x440499
>> Code: 18 89 d0 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 fb 13 fc ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
>> RSP: 002b:00007ffcf12caf08 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004002c8 RCX: 0000000000440499
>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000200006c0 RDI: 0000000000000003
>> RBP: 00000000006ca018 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000004002c8
>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000040
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This bug is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
>> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
>> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
>>
>> syzbot will keep track of this bug report. See:
>> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bug-status-tracking for how to communicate with syzbot.
>> syzbot can test patches for this bug, for details see:
>> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches
I got it.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists