lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190320134632.GA251185@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Mar 2019 08:46:32 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>
Cc:     austin_bolen@...l.com, alex_gagniuc@...lteam.com,
        keith.busch@...el.com, Shyam_Iyer@...l.com, lukas@...ner.de,
        okaya@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/LINK: bw_notification: Do not leave interrupt
 handler NULL

Hi Alexandru,

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 08:12:04PM -0500, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> A threaded IRQ with a NULL handler does not work with level-triggered
> interrupts. request_threaded_irq() will return an error:
> 
>   genirq: Threaded irq requested with handler=NULL and !ONESHOT for irq 16
>   pcie_bw_notification: probe of 0000:00:1b.0:pcie010 failed with error -22
> 
> For level interrupts we need to silence the interrupt before exiting
> the IRQ handler, so just clear the PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LBMS bit there.
> 
> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>

What's your thought regarding Lukas' comment?  If you do repost this,
please add a Fixes: tag to help connect this with the initial commit.

If not, I can add the tag myself.

> ---
> 
> OOPS! I'm sorry for the noise. Here's the fix.
> 
> I was able to test this on edge-triggered interrupts. None of my
> machines have PCIe ports that use level-triggered interrupts. This
> might not be too straightforward to test without a hardware yanker,
> but if there's a way to force a specific interrupt to be level
> triggered, I could do the testing on my end.
> 
>  drivers/pci/pcie/bw_notification.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/bw_notification.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/bw_notification.c
> index d2eae3b7cc0f..001d6253ad48 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/bw_notification.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/bw_notification.c
> @@ -44,11 +44,10 @@ static void pcie_disable_link_bandwidth_notification(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, lnk_ctl);
>  }
>  
> -static irqreturn_t pcie_bw_notification_handler(int irq, void *context)
> +static irqreturn_t pcie_bw_notification_irq(int irq, void *context)
>  {
>  	struct pcie_device *srv = context;
>  	struct pci_dev *port = srv->port;
> -	struct pci_dev *dev;
>  	u16 link_status, events;
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -58,6 +57,17 @@ static irqreturn_t pcie_bw_notification_handler(int irq, void *context)
>  	if (ret != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL || !events)
>  		return IRQ_NONE;
>  
> +	pcie_capability_write_word(port, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, events);
> +	return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t pcie_bw_notification_handler(int irq, void *context)
> +{
> +	struct pcie_device *srv = context;
> +	struct pci_dev *port = srv->port;
> +	struct pci_dev *dev;
> +	u16 link_status;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Print status from downstream devices, not this root port or
>  	 * downstream switch port.
> @@ -67,8 +77,8 @@ static irqreturn_t pcie_bw_notification_handler(int irq, void *context)
>  		__pcie_print_link_status(dev, false);
>  	up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
>  
> +	pcie_capability_read_word(port, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &link_status);
>  	pcie_update_link_speed(port->subordinate, link_status);
> -	pcie_capability_write_word(port, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, events);
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> @@ -80,7 +90,8 @@ static int pcie_bandwidth_notification_probe(struct pcie_device *srv)
>  	if (!pcie_link_bandwidth_notification_supported(srv->port))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	ret = request_threaded_irq(srv->irq, NULL, pcie_bw_notification_handler,
> +	ret = request_threaded_irq(srv->irq, pcie_bw_notification_irq,
> +				   pcie_bw_notification_handler,
>  				   IRQF_SHARED, "PCIe BW notif", srv);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> -- 
> 2.19.2
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ