linux-kernel - [PATCH -next] KVM: arm: vgic: Make two functions static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190320141813.10380-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Mar 2019 22:18:13 +0800
From:   Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To:     <christoffer.dall@....com>, <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        <james.morse@....com>, <julien.thierry@....com>,
        <suzuki.poulose@....com>, <andre.przywara@....com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] KVM: arm: vgic: Make two functions static

From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>

Fix sparse warnings:

arch/arm64/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c:1732:5: warning:
 symbol 'vgic_its_has_attr_regs' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm64/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c:1753:5: warning:
 symbol 'vgic_its_attr_regs_access' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index ab3f477..a97db69 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -1729,8 +1729,8 @@ static void vgic_its_destroy(struct kvm_device *kvm_dev)
 	kfree(its);
 }
 
-int vgic_its_has_attr_regs(struct kvm_device *dev,
-			   struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
+static int vgic_its_has_attr_regs(struct kvm_device *dev,
+				  struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
 {
 	const struct vgic_register_region *region;
 	gpa_t offset = attr->attr;
@@ -1750,9 +1750,9 @@ int vgic_its_has_attr_regs(struct kvm_device *dev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int vgic_its_attr_regs_access(struct kvm_device *dev,
-			      struct kvm_device_attr *attr,
-			      u64 *reg, bool is_write)
+static int vgic_its_attr_regs_access(struct kvm_device *dev,
+				     struct kvm_device_attr *attr,
+				     u64 *reg, bool is_write)
 {
 	const struct vgic_register_region *region;
 	struct vgic_its *its;
-- 
2.7.0