linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] driver : staging : ion: optimization for decreasing memory fragmentaion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <73eb235f-9515-916e-ff20-0491fe2e107e@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Mar 2019 07:28:33 -0700
From:   Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com>,
        Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver : staging : ion: optimization for decreasing
 memory fragmentaion

On 3/20/19 7:23 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> You should have CC'd the ION maintainers/lists per
> ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl - CCing now.
> 
> On 3/14/19 12:06 PM, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
>> From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
>>
>> Two action for this patch:
>> 1. set a batch size for system heap's shrinker, which can have it buffer
>> reasonable page blocks in pool for future allocation.
>> 2. reverse the order sequence when free page blocks, the purpose is also
>> to have system heap keep as more big blocks as it can.
>>
>> By testing on an android system with 2G RAM, the changes with setting
>> batch = 48MB can help reduce the fragmentation obviously and improve
>> big block allocation speed for 15%.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_heap.c        | 12 +++++++++++-
>>   drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c |  2 +-
>>   2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_heap.c b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_heap.c
>> index 31db510..9e9caf2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_heap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_heap.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
>>   #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>>   #include "ion.h"
>>   
>> +unsigned long ion_heap_batch = 0;
>> +
>>   void *ion_heap_map_kernel(struct ion_heap *heap,
>>   			  struct ion_buffer *buffer)
>>   {
>> @@ -303,7 +305,15 @@ int ion_heap_init_shrinker(struct ion_heap *heap)
>>   	heap->shrinker.count_objects = ion_heap_shrink_count;
>>   	heap->shrinker.scan_objects = ion_heap_shrink_scan;
>>   	heap->shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
>> -	heap->shrinker.batch = 0;
>> +	heap->shrinker.batch = ion_heap_batch;
>>   
>>   	return register_shrinker(&heap->shrinker);
>>   }
>> +
>> +static int __init ion_system_heap_batch_init(char *arg)
>> +{
>> +	 ion_heap_batch = memparse(arg, NULL);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +early_param("ion_batch", ion_system_heap_batch_init);
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c
>> index 701eb9f..d249f8d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c
>> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int ion_system_heap_shrink(struct ion_heap *heap, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>>   	if (!nr_to_scan)
>>   		only_scan = 1;
>>   
>> -	for (i = 0; i < NUM_ORDERS; i++) {
>> +	for (i = NUM_ORDERS - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
>>   		pool = sys_heap->pools[i];
>>   
>>   		if (only_scan) {
>>
> 

We're in the process of significantly reworking Ion so I
don't think it makes sense to take these as we work to
get things out of staging. You can resubmit this later,
but when you do please split this into two separate
patches since it's actually two independent changes.

Thanks,
Laura