lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 20 Mar 2019 22:49:09 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Tang <andy.tang@....com>
Cc:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
        "edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ls1088a: add one more thermal zone node

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 08:44:18AM +0000, Andy Tang wrote:
> > > Sensor ID		placement
> > > 1			DDR controller 1
> > > 2			DDR controller 2
> > > 3			DDR controller 3
> > > 4			core cluster 1
> > > 5 		core cluster 2
> > > 6 		core cluster 3
> > > 7 		core cluster 4
> > >
> > > Apparently using CPU or CPU-cluster is not appropriate. Core-cluster is better.
> > 
> > So using CPU is appropriate for me, less confusing, more consistent with other
> > platforms.
> What about core cluster? We can't name it cpu0, cpu1 etc I think.

Hmm, yes, that would be even more confusing.  What about cpu-thermal-1,
cpu-thermal-2 ...?

Shawn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ