[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4dcdcd9c-e599-5b8a-b628-4b02b7a092a1@metux.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 17:04:41 +0100
From: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Enrico Weigelt <info@...ux.net>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: amd-fch: Fix bogus SPDX identifier
On 19.03.19 15:28, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> spdxcheck.py complains:
>
> include/linux/platform_data/gpio/gpio-amd-fch.h: 1:28 Invalid License ID: GPL+
>
> which is correct because GPL+ is not a valid identifier. Of course this
> could have been caught by checkpatch.pl _before_ submitting or merging the
> patch.
>
> WARNING: 'SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL+ */' is not supported in LICENSES/...
> #271: FILE: include/linux/platform_data/gpio/gpio-amd-fch.h:1:
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL+ */
>
> Fix it under the assumption that the author meant GPL-2.0+, which makes
> sense as the corresponding C file is using that identifier.
Your assumption is correct.
Acked-By: Enrico Weigelt <info@...ux.net>
I just wonder, why checkpatch.pl didn't bleat me.
Thanks for the fix.
--mtx
--
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@...ux.net -- +49-151-27565287
Powered by blists - more mailing lists