lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 23:09:26 -0400 From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> To: Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@...stin.ca> Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] [WIP] tools/power turbostat: Also read package power on AMD F17h (Zen) > (I previously wrote that this would be easier to test with the patch > applied, because the package power is reported with the -Dump option, > but I'm not sure that's actually the case - the value might still only > be collected once per package?) Right -- we'd have to move it to a per-core or per-CPU data structure to capture it on a finer granularity than per package. Of course, if you want to see if you get different values on the cpus, you can always dump the raw values from each cpu using rdmsr(1). Unfortunately, I don't have that AMD hardware -- somebody with an interest in it can test it out. thanks, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists