linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/2] guarantee natural alignment for kmalloc()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <718a767c-5f0c-7435-3f9b-c63bcd5b488f@suse.cz>
Date:   Thu, 21 Mar 2019 08:02:32 +0100
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] guarantee natural alignment for kmalloc()

On 3/21/19 3:23 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:48:03PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>
>> Well, looks like that's what happens. This is with SLAB, but the alignment
>> calculations should be common: 
>>
>> slabinfo - version: 2.1
>> # name            <active_objs> <num_objs> <objsize> <objperslab> <pagesperslab> : tunables <limit> <batchcount> <sharedfactor> : slabdata <active_slabs> <num_slabs> <sharedavail>
>> kmalloc-96          2611   4896    128   32    1 : tunables  120   60    8 : slabdata    153    153      0
>> kmalloc-128         4798   5536    128   32    1 : tunables  120   60    8 : slabdata    173    173      0
> 
> Hmm.  On my laptop, I see:
> 
> kmalloc-96         28050  35364     96   42    1 : tunables    0    0    0 : slabdata    842    842      0
> 
> That'd take me from 842 * 4k pages to 1105 4k pages -- an extra megabyte of
> memory.
> 
> This is running Debian's 4.19 kernel:
> 
> # CONFIG_SLAB is not set
> CONFIG_SLUB=y

Ah, you're right. SLAB creates kmalloc caches with:

#ifndef ARCH_KMALLOC_FLAGS
#define ARCH_KMALLOC_FLAGS SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN
#endif

create_kmalloc_caches(ARCH_KMALLOC_FLAGS);

While SLUB just:

create_kmalloc_caches(0);

even though it uses SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN for kmem_cache_node and
kmem_cache caches.