[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PU1P153MB016935A5D6D203B9E44CEDB2BF420@PU1P153MB0169.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 00:42:10 +0000
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
CC: "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org"
<driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"marcelo.cerri@...onical.com" <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>,
"jackm@...lanox.com" <jackm@...lanox.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: hv: Add pci_destroy_slot() in
pci_devices_present_work(), if necessary
> From: linux-hyperv-owner@...r.kernel.org
> <linux-hyperv-owner@...r.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Dexuan Cui
> > ...
> > Patch 2 in this series does set it to NULL, but this code does not.
> In Patch2, i.e. in the code path hv_pci_remove() -> hv_pci_remove_slots(),
> we must set hpdev->pci_slot to NULL, otherwise, later, due to
> hv_pci_remove() -> hv_pci_bus_exit() ->
> hv_pci_devices_present() with the zero "relations", we'll double-free the
> "hpdev" struct in pci_devices_present_work() -- see the above.
A minor correction: I meant we'll call pci_destroy_slot(hpdev->pci_slot)
twice, not "double-free hpdev".
Thanks,
-- Dexuan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists