linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: exynos-bus: Suspend all devices on system shutdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:29:19 +0100
From:   Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com>,
        Markus Reichl <m.reichl@...etechno.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: exynos-bus: Suspend all devices on system
 shutdown

Hi Chanwoo,

On 2019-03-21 10:19, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 19. 3. 21. 오후 6:01, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> Force all Exynos buses to safe operation points before doing the system
>> reboot operation. There are board on which some aggressive power saving
>> operation points are behind the capabilities of the bootloader to properly
>> reset the hardware and boot the board. This way one can avoid board crash
>> early after reboot.
>>
>> This fixes reboot issue on OdroidU3 board both with eMMC and SD boot.
>>
>> Reported-by: Markus Reichl <m.reichl@...etechno.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
>> ---
>> This is an alternative to https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10781433/
>> limited only to Exynos-bus driver.
>> ---
>>   drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 8 ++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>> index c25658b26598..486cc5b422f1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>> @@ -514,6 +514,13 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void exynos_bus_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct exynos_bus *bus = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>> +	devfreq_suspend_device(bus->devfreq);
>> +}
>> +
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>   static int exynos_bus_resume(struct device *dev)
>>   {
>> @@ -556,6 +563,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, exynos_bus_of_match);
>>   
>>   static struct platform_driver exynos_bus_platdrv = {
>>   	.probe		= exynos_bus_probe,
>> +	.shutdown	= exynos_bus_shutdown,
>>   	.driver = {
>>   		.name	= "exynos-bus",
>>   		.pm	= &exynos_bus_pm,
>>
> Actually, I already agreed the previous patch.
> Also, it looks good to me.

Yes, I know, but MyungJoo had some objections, that's why I prepared 
alternative version.

> Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
>
Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland