[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190321134549.GB4603@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:45:49 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: keyrings@...r.kernel.org, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] security/keys/encrypted: Break module dependency
chain
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 02:01:44PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:18 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > With v5.1-rc1 all the nvdimm sub-system regression tests started failing
> > because the libnvdimm module failed to load in the qemu-kvm test
> > environment. Critically that environment does not have a TPM. Commit
> > 240730437deb "KEYS: trusted: explicitly use tpm_chip structure..."
> > started to require a TPM to be present for the trusted.ko module to load
> > where there was no requirement for that before.
> >
> > Rather than undo the "fail if no hardware" behavior James points out
> > that the module dependencies can be broken by looking up the key-type by
> > name. Remove the dependencies on the "key_type_trusted" and
> > "key_type_encrypted" symbol exports, and clean up other boilerplate that
> > supported those exports in different configurations.
>
> Any feedback? Was hoping to get at least patch1 in the queue for
> v5.1-rc2 since this effectively disables the nvdimm driver on typical
> configurations. Jarkko, would you be willing to merge it since the
> regression came through your tree?
Yes, of course. The feedback has been extremely passive because I've
been sick leave for the early week :-)
Before I'm merging this I'm just thinking that would it be better
idea to merge a patch for trusted.c that reverts the old behavior
with cc to stable and fixes tags as I said in my earlier response.
It would less intrusive for stable kernels. Lets quickly sort out
the best strategy before merging.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists