linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] s390: ap: kvm: add PQAP interception for AQIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:05:37 +0100
From:   Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        frankja@...ux.ibm.com, akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com,
        schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
        freude@...ux.ibm.com, mimu@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] s390: ap: kvm: add PQAP interception for AQIC

On 19/03/2019 18:07, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 19/03/2019 15:54, Halil Pasic wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:01:44 +0100
>> Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 15/03/2019 18:28, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>

...snip...

>>
>>> We should also do it right for TAPQ with t bit set. I remember
>>> Christian already warned about this but we did not implement it.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I have some blurry memories of something similar myself. I wonder
>> if there was a reason, or did we just forget to address this issue.
> 
> 
> I will integrate it in the next iteration too, even it is not IRQ, the 
> PQAP hook patch can be more general.

After all, I will not do this, I remember the reason why we did not do 
it once: simply it is not intercepted until we enable it.

So we will handle it when we enable the TAPQ-t interception

Regards,
Pierre

-- 
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany