[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190321153036.43084-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 18:30:36 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] lib/generic-radix-tree: Make good use of while (level--)
There is no need to split postincrement in while (level--) type of loops.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
lib/generic-radix-tree.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/generic-radix-tree.c b/lib/generic-radix-tree.c
index a7bafc413730..5a1818a0de1f 100644
--- a/lib/generic-radix-tree.c
+++ b/lib/generic-radix-tree.c
@@ -59,13 +59,9 @@ void *__genradix_ptr(struct __genradix *radix, size_t offset)
if (ilog2(offset) >= genradix_depth_shift(level))
return NULL;
- while (1) {
+ while (level--) {
if (!n)
return NULL;
- if (!level)
- break;
-
- level--;
n = n->children[offset >> genradix_depth_shift(level)];
offset &= genradix_depth_size(level) - 1;
@@ -157,9 +153,7 @@ void *__genradix_iter_peek(struct genradix_iter *iter,
if (ilog2(iter->offset) >= genradix_depth_shift(level))
return NULL;
- while (level) {
- level--;
-
+ while (level--) {
i = (iter->offset >> genradix_depth_shift(level)) &
(GENRADIX_ARY - 1);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists