lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:14:20 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 107/280] bnxt_en: Fix typo in firmware message timeout logic.

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit 67681d02aaa1db9044a16df4ca9c77cde1221a3e ]

The logic that polls for the firmware message response uses a shorter
sleep interval for the first few passes.  But there was a typo so it
was using the wrong counter (larger counter) for these short sleep
passes.  The result is a slightly shorter timeout period for these
firmware messages than intended.  Fix it by using the proper counter.

Fixes: 9751e8e71487 ("bnxt_en: reduce timeout on initial HWRM calls")
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index 1fdaf86bbe8f..63b97289f4fe 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -3542,7 +3542,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_do_send_msg(struct bnxt *bp, void *msg, u32 msg_len,
 			if (len)
 				break;
 			/* on first few passes, just barely sleep */
-			if (i < DFLT_HWRM_CMD_TIMEOUT)
+			if (i < HWRM_SHORT_TIMEOUT_COUNTER)
 				usleep_range(HWRM_SHORT_MIN_TIMEOUT,
 					     HWRM_SHORT_MAX_TIMEOUT);
 			else
-- 
2.19.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists