linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 190/280] ext2: Fix underflow in ext2_max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190322111328.520441664@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:15:43 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 190/280] ext2: Fix underflow in ext2_max_size()

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit 1c2d14212b15a60300a2d4f6364753e87394c521 upstream.

When ext2 filesystem is created with 64k block size, ext2_max_size()
will return value less than 0. Also, we cannot write any file in this fs
since the sb->maxbytes is less than 0. The core of the problem is that
the size of block index tree for such large block size is more than
i_blocks can carry. So fix the computation to count with this
possibility.

File size limits computed with the new function for the full range of
possible block sizes look like:

bits file_size
10     17247252480
11    275415851008
12   2196873666560
13   2197948973056
14   2198486220800
15   2198754754560
16   2198888906752

CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ext2/super.c |   41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext2/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/super.c
@@ -761,7 +761,8 @@ static loff_t ext2_max_size(int bits)
 {
 	loff_t res = EXT2_NDIR_BLOCKS;
 	int meta_blocks;
-	loff_t upper_limit;
+	unsigned int upper_limit;
+	unsigned int ppb = 1 << (bits-2);
 
 	/* This is calculated to be the largest file size for a
 	 * dense, file such that the total number of
@@ -775,24 +776,34 @@ static loff_t ext2_max_size(int bits)
 	/* total blocks in file system block size */
 	upper_limit >>= (bits - 9);
 
-
-	/* indirect blocks */
-	meta_blocks = 1;
-	/* double indirect blocks */
-	meta_blocks += 1 + (1LL << (bits-2));
-	/* tripple indirect blocks */
-	meta_blocks += 1 + (1LL << (bits-2)) + (1LL << (2*(bits-2)));
-
-	upper_limit -= meta_blocks;
-	upper_limit <<= bits;
-
+	/* Compute how many blocks we can address by block tree */
 	res += 1LL << (bits-2);
 	res += 1LL << (2*(bits-2));
 	res += 1LL << (3*(bits-2));
+	/* Does block tree limit file size? */
+	if (res < upper_limit)
+		goto check_lfs;
+
+	res = upper_limit;
+	/* How many metadata blocks are needed for addressing upper_limit? */
+	upper_limit -= EXT2_NDIR_BLOCKS;
+	/* indirect blocks */
+	meta_blocks = 1;
+	upper_limit -= ppb;
+	/* double indirect blocks */
+	if (upper_limit < ppb * ppb) {
+		meta_blocks += 1 + DIV_ROUND_UP(upper_limit, ppb);
+		res -= meta_blocks;
+		goto check_lfs;
+	}
+	meta_blocks += 1 + ppb;
+	upper_limit -= ppb * ppb;
+	/* tripple indirect blocks for the rest */
+	meta_blocks += 1 + DIV_ROUND_UP(upper_limit, ppb) +
+		DIV_ROUND_UP(upper_limit, ppb*ppb);
+	res -= meta_blocks;
+check_lfs:
 	res <<= bits;
-	if (res > upper_limit)
-		res = upper_limit;
-
 	if (res > MAX_LFS_FILESIZE)
 		res = MAX_LFS_FILESIZE;