lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:13:06 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 033/280] Input: pwm-vibra - stop regulator after disabling pwm, not before

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit 94803aef3533676194c772383472636c453e3147 ]

This patch fixes order of disable calls in pwm_vibrator_stop.
Currently when starting device, we first enable vcc regulator and then
setup and enable pwm. When stopping, we should do this in oposite order,
so first disable pwm and then disable regulator.
Previously order was the same as in start.

Signed-off-by: Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/input/misc/pwm-vibra.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pwm-vibra.c b/drivers/input/misc/pwm-vibra.c
index 9df87431d7d4..dbb6d9e1b947 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/pwm-vibra.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/pwm-vibra.c
@@ -80,14 +80,14 @@ static int pwm_vibrator_start(struct pwm_vibrator *vibrator)
 
 static void pwm_vibrator_stop(struct pwm_vibrator *vibrator)
 {
+	if (vibrator->pwm_dir)
+		pwm_disable(vibrator->pwm_dir);
+	pwm_disable(vibrator->pwm);
+
 	if (vibrator->vcc_on) {
 		regulator_disable(vibrator->vcc);
 		vibrator->vcc_on = false;
 	}
-
-	if (vibrator->pwm_dir)
-		pwm_disable(vibrator->pwm_dir);
-	pwm_disable(vibrator->pwm);
 }
 
 static void pwm_vibrator_play_work(struct work_struct *work)
-- 
2.19.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists