[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190322111222.344175860@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:15:52 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 080/118] kernel/sysctl.c: add missing range check in do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>
commit 8cf7630b29701d364f8df4a50e4f1f5e752b2778 upstream.
This bug has apparently existed since the introduction of this function
in the pre-git era (4500e91754d3 in Thomas Gleixner's history.git,
"[NET]: Add proc_dointvec_userhz_jiffies, use it for proper handling of
neighbour sysctls.").
As a minimal fix we can simply duplicate the corresponding check in
do_proc_dointvec_conv().
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190207123426.9202-3-zev@bewilderbeest.net
Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> [2.6.2+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/sysctl.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -2377,7 +2377,16 @@ static int do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv(
{
struct do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv_param *param = data;
if (write) {
- int val = *negp ? -*lvalp : *lvalp;
+ int val;
+ if (*negp) {
+ if (*lvalp > (unsigned long) INT_MAX + 1)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ val = -*lvalp;
+ } else {
+ if (*lvalp > (unsigned long) INT_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ val = *lvalp;
+ }
if ((param->min && *param->min > val) ||
(param->max && *param->max < val))
return -EINVAL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists