lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 18:51:14 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> To: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@...hat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, dyoung@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com, Thomas.Lendacky@....com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v9] x86/mm: Change the examination condition to avoid confusion On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 06:33:07PM +0800, Lianbo Jiang wrote: > Following the commit <0e4c12b45aa8> ("x86/mm, resource: Use > PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages"), The proper commit quotation format is done by adding this to your .gitconfig: [core] abbrev = 12 [alias] one = show -s --pretty='format:%h (\"%s\")' and then doing: $ git one <commit id> which will give you 0e4c12b45aa8 ("x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages") > here it is really checking for the 'IORES_DESC_ACPI_*' values. Well, it is not really checking that. > Therefore, it is necessary to change the examination condition > to avoid confusion. What confusion? The justification for that change sounds really fishy. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists