[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190322175114.GL12472@zn.tnic>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 18:51:14 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, dyoung@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com,
Thomas.Lendacky@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v9] x86/mm: Change the examination condition to avoid
confusion
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 06:33:07PM +0800, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
> Following the commit <0e4c12b45aa8> ("x86/mm, resource: Use
> PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages"),
The proper commit quotation format is done by adding this to your
.gitconfig:
[core]
abbrev = 12
[alias]
one = show -s --pretty='format:%h (\"%s\")'
and then doing:
$ git one <commit id>
which will give you
0e4c12b45aa8 ("x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages")
> here it is really checking for the 'IORES_DESC_ACPI_*' values.
Well, it is not really checking that.
> Therefore, it is necessary to change the examination condition
> to avoid confusion.
What confusion?
The justification for that change sounds really fishy.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists