lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 23:51:20 +0000 From: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name> To: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com> Subject: Re: [PATCH REBASED] mm, memcg: Make scan aggression always exclude protection Chris Down writes: >Are you certain? If so, I don't see what you mean. This is how the >code looks in Linus' tree after the fixups: Hmm, apparently this actually didn't go into Linus' tree yet, so yeah, seems worth having as a fixup maybe indeed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists