[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190322074225.22282-3-alex@ghiti.fr>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 03:42:23 -0400
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] arm: Use generic mmap top-down layout
arm uses a top-down layout by default that fits the generic functions.
At the same time, this commit allows to fix the following problems:
- one uncovered and not fixed for arm here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1429066.html
- the use of TASK_SIZE instead of STACK_TOP in mmap_base which, when
address space of a task is 26 bits, would assign mmap base way too high.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
arch/arm/mm/mmap.c | 52 --------------------------------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 53 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h
index 57fe73ea0f72..03837d325a2f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static inline void prefetchw(const void *ptr)
#endif
#endif
-#define HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT
+#define ARCH_WANT_DEFAULT_TOPDOWN_MMAP_LAYOUT
#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmap.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmap.c
index f866870db749..b8d912ac9e61 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmap.c
@@ -17,33 +17,6 @@
((((addr)+SHMLBA-1)&~(SHMLBA-1)) + \
(((pgoff)<<PAGE_SHIFT) & (SHMLBA-1)))
-/* gap between mmap and stack */
-#define MIN_GAP (128*1024*1024UL)
-#define MAX_GAP ((TASK_SIZE)/6*5)
-
-static int mmap_is_legacy(struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
-{
- if (current->personality & ADDR_COMPAT_LAYOUT)
- return 1;
-
- if (rlim_stack->rlim_cur == RLIM_INFINITY)
- return 1;
-
- return sysctl_legacy_va_layout;
-}
-
-static unsigned long mmap_base(unsigned long rnd, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
-{
- unsigned long gap = rlim_stack->rlim_cur;
-
- if (gap < MIN_GAP)
- gap = MIN_GAP;
- else if (gap > MAX_GAP)
- gap = MAX_GAP;
-
- return PAGE_ALIGN(TASK_SIZE - gap - rnd);
-}
-
/*
* We need to ensure that shared mappings are correctly aligned to
* avoid aliasing issues with VIPT caches. We need to ensure that
@@ -171,31 +144,6 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct file *filp, const unsigned long addr0,
return addr;
}
-unsigned long arch_mmap_rnd(void)
-{
- unsigned long rnd;
-
- rnd = get_random_long() & ((1UL << mmap_rnd_bits) - 1);
-
- return rnd << PAGE_SHIFT;
-}
-
-void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
-{
- unsigned long random_factor = 0UL;
-
- if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE)
- random_factor = arch_mmap_rnd();
-
- if (mmap_is_legacy(rlim_stack)) {
- mm->mmap_base = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE + random_factor;
- mm->get_unmapped_area = arch_get_unmapped_area;
- } else {
- mm->mmap_base = mmap_base(random_factor, rlim_stack);
- mm->get_unmapped_area = arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown;
- }
-}
-
/*
* You really shouldn't be using read() or write() on /dev/mem. This
* might go away in the future.
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists