lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:13:58 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com> Subject: [PATCH 3.18 025/134] libceph: handle an empty authorize reply 3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com> commit 0fd3fd0a9bb0b02b6435bb7070e9f7b82a23f068 upstream. The authorize reply can be empty, for example when the ticket used to build the authorizer is too old and TAG_BADAUTHORIZER is returned from the service. Calling ->verify_authorizer_reply() results in an attempt to decrypt and validate (somewhat) random data in au->buf (most likely the signature block from calc_signature()), which fails and ends up in con_fault_finish() with !con->auth_retry. The ticket isn't invalidated and the connection is retried again and again until a new ticket is obtained from the monitor: libceph: osd2 192.168.122.1:6809 bad authorize reply libceph: osd2 192.168.122.1:6809 bad authorize reply libceph: osd2 192.168.122.1:6809 bad authorize reply libceph: osd2 192.168.122.1:6809 bad authorize reply Let TAG_BADAUTHORIZER handler kick in and increment con->auth_retry. Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org Fixes: 5c056fdc5b47 ("libceph: verify authorize reply on connect") Link: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/20164 Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com> Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com> [idryomov@...il.com: backport to 4.4: extra arg, no CEPHX_V2] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> --- net/ceph/messenger.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/net/ceph/messenger.c +++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c @@ -1980,15 +1980,19 @@ static int process_connect(struct ceph_c dout("process_connect on %p tag %d\n", con, (int)con->in_tag); if (con->auth_reply_buf) { + int len = le32_to_cpu(con->in_reply.authorizer_len); + /* * Any connection that defines ->get_authorizer() * should also define ->verify_authorizer_reply(). * See get_connect_authorizer(). */ - ret = con->ops->verify_authorizer_reply(con, 0); - if (ret < 0) { - con->error_msg = "bad authorize reply"; - return ret; + if (len) { + ret = con->ops->verify_authorizer_reply(con, 0); + if (ret < 0) { + con->error_msg = "bad authorize reply"; + return ret; + } } }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists