lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 18:45:08 -0700 From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com> To: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, shuah@...nel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, brakmo@...com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, "Bird, Timothy" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>, Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com>, devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>, wfg@...ux.intel.com Subject: Re: [RFC v4 16/17] of: unittest: split out a couple of test cases from unittest On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 6:15 PM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote: > > On 2/14/19 1:37 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote: > > Split out a couple of test cases that these features in base.c from the > > unittest.c monolith. The intention is that we will eventually split out > > all test cases and group them together based on what portion of device > > tree they test. > > I still object to this patch. I do not want this code scattered into > additional files. Sure, no problem. I will remove this from future revisions.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists