[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190322111243.754326698@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:14:00 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 102/230] fs/drop_caches.c: avoid softlockups in drop_pagecache_sb()
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit c27d82f52f75fc9d8d9d40d120d2a96fdeeada5e ]
When superblock has lots of inodes without any pagecache (like is the
case for /proc), drop_pagecache_sb() will iterate through all of them
without dropping sb->s_inode_list_lock which can lead to softlockups
(one of our customers hit this).
Fix the problem by going to the slow path and doing cond_resched() in
case the process needs rescheduling.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190114085343.15011-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/drop_caches.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/drop_caches.c b/fs/drop_caches.c
index d72d52b90433..280460fef066 100644
--- a/fs/drop_caches.c
+++ b/fs/drop_caches.c
@@ -20,8 +20,13 @@ static void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *sb, void *unused)
spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry(inode, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+ /*
+ * We must skip inodes in unusual state. We may also skip
+ * inodes without pages but we deliberately won't in case
+ * we need to reschedule to avoid softlockups.
+ */
if ((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE|I_NEW)) ||
- (inode->i_mapping->nrpages == 0)) {
+ (inode->i_mapping->nrpages == 0 && !need_resched())) {
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
continue;
}
@@ -29,6 +34,7 @@ static void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *sb, void *unused)
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
+ cond_resched();
invalidate_mapping_pages(inode->i_mapping, 0, -1);
iput(toput_inode);
toput_inode = inode;
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists