[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190322111246.614628121@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:14:40 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jianlin Shi <jishi@...hat.com>,
Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 142/230] vxlan: Fix GRO cells race condition between receive and link delete
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
[ Upstream commit ad6c9986bcb627c7c22b8f9e9a934becc27df87c ]
If we receive a packet while deleting a VXLAN device, there's a chance
vxlan_rcv() is called at the same time as vxlan_dellink(). This is fine,
except that vxlan_dellink() should never ever touch stuff that's still in
use, such as the GRO cells list.
Otherwise, vxlan_rcv() crashes while queueing packets via
gro_cells_receive().
Move the gro_cells_destroy() to vxlan_uninit(), which runs after the RCU
grace period is elapsed and nothing needs the gro_cells anymore.
This is now done in the same way as commit 8e816df87997 ("geneve: Use GRO
cells infrastructure.") originally implemented for GENEVE.
Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <jishi@...hat.com>
Fixes: 58ce31cca1ff ("vxlan: GRO support at tunnel layer")
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/vxlan.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -2322,6 +2322,8 @@ static void vxlan_uninit(struct net_devi
{
struct vxlan_dev *vxlan = netdev_priv(dev);
+ gro_cells_destroy(&vxlan->gro_cells);
+
vxlan_fdb_delete_default(vxlan);
free_percpu(dev->tstats);
@@ -3066,7 +3068,6 @@ static void vxlan_dellink(struct net_dev
{
struct vxlan_dev *vxlan = netdev_priv(dev);
- gro_cells_destroy(&vxlan->gro_cells);
list_del(&vxlan->next);
unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, head);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists