[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190322111247.061986500@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:14:46 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 148/230] Its wrong to add len to sector_nr in raid10 reshape twice
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>
commit b761dcf1217760a42f7897c31dcb649f59b2333e upstream.
In reshape_request it already adds len to sector_nr already. It's wrong to add len to
sector_nr again after adding pages to bio. If there is bad block it can't copy one chunk
at a time, it needs to goto read_more. Now the sector_nr is wrong. It can cause data
corruption.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v3.16+
Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/md/raid10.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -4442,7 +4442,6 @@ bio_full:
atomic_inc(&r10_bio->remaining);
read_bio->bi_next = NULL;
generic_make_request(read_bio);
- sector_nr += nr_sectors;
sectors_done += nr_sectors;
if (sector_nr <= last)
goto read_more;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists