lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:14:46 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com> Subject: [PATCH 4.4 148/230] Its wrong to add len to sector_nr in raid10 reshape twice 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com> commit b761dcf1217760a42f7897c31dcb649f59b2333e upstream. In reshape_request it already adds len to sector_nr already. It's wrong to add len to sector_nr again after adding pages to bio. If there is bad block it can't copy one chunk at a time, it needs to goto read_more. Now the sector_nr is wrong. It can cause data corruption. Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v3.16+ Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> --- drivers/md/raid10.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c @@ -4442,7 +4442,6 @@ bio_full: atomic_inc(&r10_bio->remaining); read_bio->bi_next = NULL; generic_make_request(read_bio); - sector_nr += nr_sectors; sectors_done += nr_sectors; if (sector_nr <= last) goto read_more;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists