[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190322111218.971637803@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:15:11 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 039/118] nfp: bpf: fix ALU32 high bits clearance bug
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit f036ebd9bfbe1e91a3d855e85e05fc5ff156b641 ]
NFP BPF JIT compiler is doing a couple of small optimizations when jitting
ALU imm instructions, some of these optimizations could save code-gen, for
example:
A & -1 = A
A | 0 = A
A ^ 0 = A
However, for ALU32, high 32-bit of the 64-bit register should still be
cleared according to ISA semantics.
Fixes: cd7df56ed3e6 ("nfp: add BPF to NFP code translator")
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
.../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_bpf_jit.c | 17 ++++++-----------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_bpf_jit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_bpf_jit.c
index 6bfcd6eb74ca..73087770d72f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_bpf_jit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_bpf_jit.c
@@ -756,15 +756,10 @@ wrp_alu64_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta,
static int
wrp_alu32_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta,
- enum alu_op alu_op, bool skip)
+ enum alu_op alu_op)
{
const struct bpf_insn *insn = &meta->insn;
- if (skip) {
- meta->skip = true;
- return 0;
- }
-
wrp_alu_imm(nfp_prog, insn->dst_reg * 2, alu_op, insn->imm);
wrp_immed(nfp_prog, reg_both(insn->dst_reg * 2 + 1), 0);
@@ -1017,7 +1012,7 @@ static int xor_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
static int xor_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
- return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_XOR, !meta->insn.imm);
+ return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_XOR);
}
static int and_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
@@ -1027,7 +1022,7 @@ static int and_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
static int and_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
- return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_AND, !~meta->insn.imm);
+ return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_AND);
}
static int or_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
@@ -1037,7 +1032,7 @@ static int or_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
static int or_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
- return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_OR, !meta->insn.imm);
+ return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_OR);
}
static int add_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
@@ -1047,7 +1042,7 @@ static int add_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
static int add_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
- return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_ADD, !meta->insn.imm);
+ return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_ADD);
}
static int sub_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
@@ -1057,7 +1052,7 @@ static int sub_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
static int sub_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
- return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_SUB, !meta->insn.imm);
+ return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_SUB);
}
static int shl_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists