linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 049/118] CIFS: Fix read after write for files with read caching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190322111219.862684090@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:15:21 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@...rosoft.com>,
        Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>,
        Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 049/118] CIFS: Fix read after write for files with read caching

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@...il.com>

commit 6dfbd84684700cb58b34e8602c01c12f3d2595c8 upstream.

When we have a READ lease for a file and have just issued a write
operation to the server we need to purge the cache and set oplock/lease
level to NONE to avoid reading stale data. Currently we do that
only if a write operation succedeed thus not covering cases when
a request was sent to the server but a negative error code was
returned later for some other reasons (e.g. -EIOCBQUEUED or -EINTR).
Fix this by turning off caching regardless of the error code being
returned.

The patches fixes generic tests 075 and 112 from the xfs-tests.

Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/cifs/file.c |   12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -2797,14 +2797,16 @@ cifs_strict_writev(struct kiocb *iocb, s
 	 * these pages but not on the region from pos to ppos+len-1.
 	 */
 	written = cifs_user_writev(iocb, from);
-	if (written > 0 && CIFS_CACHE_READ(cinode)) {
+	if (CIFS_CACHE_READ(cinode)) {
 		/*
-		 * Windows 7 server can delay breaking level2 oplock if a write
-		 * request comes - break it on the client to prevent reading
-		 * an old data.
+		 * We have read level caching and we have just sent a write
+		 * request to the server thus making data in the cache stale.
+		 * Zap the cache and set oplock/lease level to NONE to avoid
+		 * reading stale data from the cache. All subsequent read
+		 * operations will read new data from the server.
 		 */
 		cifs_zap_mapping(inode);
-		cifs_dbg(FYI, "Set no oplock for inode=%p after a write operation\n",
+		cifs_dbg(FYI, "Set Oplock/Lease to NONE for inode=%p after write\n",
 			 inode);
 		cinode->oplock = 0;
 	}