lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:15:28 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@...hembedded.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 056/118] regulator: s2mpa01: Fix step values for some LDOs

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@...hembedded.com>

commit 28c4f730d2a44f2591cb104091da29a38dac49fe upstream.

The step values for some of the LDOs appears to be incorrect, resulting
in incorrect voltages (or at least, ones which are different from the
Samsung 3.4 vendor kernel).

Signed-off-by: Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@...hembedded.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/regulator/s2mpa01.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/regulator/s2mpa01.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/s2mpa01.c
@@ -303,13 +303,13 @@ static const struct regulator_desc regul
 	regulator_desc_ldo(2, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(3, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(4, STEP_50_MV),
-	regulator_desc_ldo(5, STEP_50_MV),
+	regulator_desc_ldo(5, STEP_25_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(6, STEP_25_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(7, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(8, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(9, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(10, STEP_50_MV),
-	regulator_desc_ldo(11, STEP_25_MV),
+	regulator_desc_ldo(11, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(12, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(13, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(14, STEP_50_MV),
@@ -320,11 +320,11 @@ static const struct regulator_desc regul
 	regulator_desc_ldo(19, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(20, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(21, STEP_50_MV),
-	regulator_desc_ldo(22, STEP_25_MV),
-	regulator_desc_ldo(23, STEP_25_MV),
+	regulator_desc_ldo(22, STEP_50_MV),
+	regulator_desc_ldo(23, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(24, STEP_50_MV),
 	regulator_desc_ldo(25, STEP_50_MV),
-	regulator_desc_ldo(26, STEP_50_MV),
+	regulator_desc_ldo(26, STEP_25_MV),
 	regulator_desc_buck1_4(1),
 	regulator_desc_buck1_4(2),
 	regulator_desc_buck1_4(3),


Powered by blists - more mailing lists