linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 068/118] crypto: pcbc - remove bogus memcpy()s with src == dest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190322111221.454118653@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:15:40 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Maxim Zhukov <mussitantesmortem@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 068/118] crypto: pcbc - remove bogus memcpy()s with src == dest

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>

commit 251b7aea34ba3c4d4fdfa9447695642eb8b8b098 upstream.

The memcpy()s in the PCBC implementation use walk->iv as both the source
and destination, which has undefined behavior.  These memcpy()'s are
actually unneeded, because walk->iv is already used to hold the previous
plaintext block XOR'd with the previous ciphertext block.  Thus,
walk->iv is already updated to its final value.

So remove the broken and unnecessary memcpy()s.

Fixes: 91652be5d1b9 ("[CRYPTO] pcbc: Add Propagated CBC template")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v2.6.21+
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhukov <mussitantesmortem@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 crypto/pcbc.c |   14 ++++----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/crypto/pcbc.c
+++ b/crypto/pcbc.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static int crypto_pcbc_encrypt_segment(s
 	unsigned int nbytes = walk->nbytes;
 	u8 *src = walk->src.virt.addr;
 	u8 *dst = walk->dst.virt.addr;
-	u8 *iv = walk->iv;
+	u8 * const iv = walk->iv;
 
 	do {
 		crypto_xor(iv, src, bsize);
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static int crypto_pcbc_encrypt_inplace(s
 	int bsize = crypto_cipher_blocksize(tfm);
 	unsigned int nbytes = walk->nbytes;
 	u8 *src = walk->src.virt.addr;
-	u8 *iv = walk->iv;
+	u8 * const iv = walk->iv;
 	u8 tmpbuf[bsize];
 
 	do {
@@ -89,8 +89,6 @@ static int crypto_pcbc_encrypt_inplace(s
 		src += bsize;
 	} while ((nbytes -= bsize) >= bsize);
 
-	memcpy(walk->iv, iv, bsize);
-
 	return nbytes;
 }
 
@@ -130,7 +128,7 @@ static int crypto_pcbc_decrypt_segment(s
 	unsigned int nbytes = walk->nbytes;
 	u8 *src = walk->src.virt.addr;
 	u8 *dst = walk->dst.virt.addr;
-	u8 *iv = walk->iv;
+	u8 * const iv = walk->iv;
 
 	do {
 		fn(crypto_cipher_tfm(tfm), dst, src);
@@ -142,8 +140,6 @@ static int crypto_pcbc_decrypt_segment(s
 		dst += bsize;
 	} while ((nbytes -= bsize) >= bsize);
 
-	memcpy(walk->iv, iv, bsize);
-
 	return nbytes;
 }
 
@@ -156,7 +152,7 @@ static int crypto_pcbc_decrypt_inplace(s
 	int bsize = crypto_cipher_blocksize(tfm);
 	unsigned int nbytes = walk->nbytes;
 	u8 *src = walk->src.virt.addr;
-	u8 *iv = walk->iv;
+	u8 * const iv = walk->iv;
 	u8 tmpbuf[bsize];
 
 	do {
@@ -169,8 +165,6 @@ static int crypto_pcbc_decrypt_inplace(s
 		src += bsize;
 	} while ((nbytes -= bsize) >= bsize);
 
-	memcpy(walk->iv, iv, bsize);
-
 	return nbytes;
 }