[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGZ6i=1ZyftH6CcMvpeWz9tLwJxusaOyz5BOaSS3YP2mijSQCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:54:06 +0800
From: Kyle Tso <kyletso@...gle.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: tcpm: collision avoidance
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:51 AM Kyle Tso <kyletso@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 1:38 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> >
> > > static enum tcpm_state tcpm_default_state(struct tcpm_port *port)
> > > {
> > > if (port->port_type == TYPEC_PORT_DRP) {
> > > @@ -600,6 +664,9 @@ static void tcpm_debugfs_exit(const struct tcpm_port *port) { }
> > >
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > +static int tcpm_ams_start(struct tcpm_port *port, enum tcpm_ams ams,
> > > + bool start);
> > > +
> >
> > Does this have to be a forward declaration ?
> >
> tcpm_pd_transmit() calls tcpm_ams_start() and tcpm_ams_start() calls
> tcpm_pd_transmit()
>
Since tcpm_ams_start will be divided into two parts, tcpm_pd_transmit no
longer needs to call tcpm_ams_start.
I will remove the forward declaration in the next version.
thanks,
Kyle
Powered by blists - more mailing lists