linux-kernel - [PATCH] timekeeping: Force upper bound for setting CLOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1903231125480.2157@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Sat, 23 Mar 2019 11:36:19 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
cc:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Hongbo Yao <yaohongbo@...wei.com>,
        Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH] timekeeping: Force upper bound for setting CLOCK_REALTIME

Several people reported testing failures after setting CLOCK_REALTIME close
to the limits of the kernel internal representation in nanoseconds,
i.e. year 2262.

The failures are exposed in subsequent operations, i.e. when arming timers
or when the advancing CLOCK_MONOTONIC makes the calculation of
CLOCK_REALTIME overflow into negative space.

Now people start to paper over the underlying problem by clamping
calculations to the valid range, but that's just wrong because such
workarounds will prevent detection of real issues as well.

It is reasonable to force an upper bound for the various methods of setting
CLOCK_REALTIME. Year 2262 is the absolute upper bound. Assume a maximum
uptime of 30 years which is plenty enough even for esoteric embedded
systems. That results in an upper bound of year 2232 for setting the time.

Once that limit is reached in reality this limit is only a small part of
the problem space. But until then this stops people from trying to paper
over the problem at the wrong places.

Reported-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
Reported-by: Hongbo Yao <yaohongbo@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
---
 include/linux/time64.h    |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/time/time.c        |    2 +-
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c |    6 +++---
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/time64.h
+++ b/include/linux/time64.h
@@ -33,6 +33,17 @@ struct itimerspec64 {
 #define KTIME_MAX			((s64)~((u64)1 << 63))
 #define KTIME_SEC_MAX			(KTIME_MAX / NSEC_PER_SEC)
 
+/*
+ * Limits for settimeofday():
+ *
+ * To prevent setting the time close to the wraparound point time setting
+ * is limited so a reasonable uptime can be accomodated. Uptime of 30 years
+ * should be really sufficient, which means the cutoff is 2232. At that
+ * point the cutoff is just a small part of the larger problem.
+ */
+#define TIME_UPTIME_SEC_MAX		(30LL * 365 * 24 *3600)
+#define TIME_SETTOD_SEC_MAX		(KTIME_SEC_MAX - TIME_UPTIME_SEC_MAX)
+
 static inline int timespec64_equal(const struct timespec64 *a,
 				   const struct timespec64 *b)
 {
@@ -99,6 +110,16 @@ static inline bool timespec64_valid_stri
 		return false;
 	return true;
 }
+
+static inline bool timespec64_valid_settod(const struct timespec64 *ts)
+{
+	if (!timespec64_valid(ts))
+		return false;
+	/* Disallow values which cause overflow issues vs. CLOCK_REALTIME */
+	if ((unsigned long long)ts->tv_sec >= TIME_SETTOD_SEC_MAX)
+		return false;
+	return true;
+}
 
 /**
  * timespec64_to_ns - Convert timespec64 to nanoseconds
--- a/kernel/time/time.c
+++ b/kernel/time/time.c
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ int do_sys_settimeofday64(const struct t
 	static int firsttime = 1;
 	int error = 0;
 
-	if (tv && !timespec64_valid(tv))
+	if (tv && !timespec64_valid_settod(tv))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	error = security_settime64(tv, tz);
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1221,7 +1221,7 @@ int do_settimeofday64(const struct times
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (!timespec64_valid_strict(ts))
+	if (!timespec64_valid_settod(ts))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
@@ -1278,7 +1278,7 @@ static int timekeeping_inject_offset(con
 	/* Make sure the proposed value is valid */
 	tmp = timespec64_add(tk_xtime(tk), *ts);
 	if (timespec64_compare(&tk->wall_to_monotonic, ts) > 0 ||
-	    !timespec64_valid_strict(&tmp)) {
+	    !timespec64_valid_settod(&tmp)) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto error;
 	}
@@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset(&wall_time, &boot_offset);
-	if (timespec64_valid_strict(&wall_time) &&
+	if (timespec64_valid_settod(&wall_time) &&
 	    timespec64_to_ns(&wall_time) > 0) {
 		persistent_clock_exists = true;
 	} else if (timespec64_to_ns(&wall_time) != 0) {