lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 23 Mar 2019 21:17:45 +0800
From:   Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Pierre-Hugues Husson <phh@....me>, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
        Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: regulator: Question about RC5T619 LDO9/10 .enable_reg and
 .enable_mask setting

Hi,
In drivers/regulator/rn5t618-regulator.c:
The RC5T619 LDO9 and LDO10 have the same .enable_reg and .enable_mask setting:
static const struct regulator_desc rc5t619_regulators[] = {
        ...
        REG(LDO9, LDOEN2, BIT(0), LDO9DAC, 0x7f, 900000, 3500000, 25000),
        REG(LDO10, LDOEN2, BIT(0), LDO10DAC, 0x7f, 900000, 3500000, 25000),
        ...
};

This seems suspicious and looks like a copy-paste mistake.
I don't find public datasheet for rc5t619.
Maybe someone can help to check if it's correct or not.

Thanks,
Axel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists