lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 23 Mar 2019 08:03:36 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
        Kamil Debski <kamil@...as.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] hwmon: pwm-fan: Add RPM support via external
 interrupt

On 3/22/19 1:24 AM, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> This adds RPM support to the pwm-fan driver in order to use with
> fancontrol/pwmconfig. This feature is intended for fans with a tachometer
> output signal, which generate a defined number of pulses per revolution.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
> ---
>   drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
> index 167221c..c8fb6a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>   
>   #include <linux/hwmon.h>
>   #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>   #include <linux/module.h>
>   #include <linux/mutex.h>
>   #include <linux/of.h>
> @@ -26,6 +27,7 @@
>   #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>   #include <linux/sysfs.h>
>   #include <linux/thermal.h>
> +#include <linux/timer.h>
>   
>   #define MAX_PWM 255
>   
> @@ -33,6 +35,14 @@ struct pwm_fan_ctx {
>   	struct mutex lock;
>   	struct pwm_device *pwm;
>   	struct regulator *reg_en;
> +
> +	int irq;
> +	atomic_t pulses;
> +	unsigned int rpm;
> +	u32 pulses_per_revolution;
> +	ktime_t sample_start;
> +	struct timer_list rpm_timer;
> +
>   	unsigned int pwm_value;
>   	unsigned int pwm_fan_state;
>   	unsigned int pwm_fan_max_state;
> @@ -40,6 +50,32 @@ struct pwm_fan_ctx {
>   	struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
>   };
>   
> +/* This handler assumes self resetting edge triggered interrupt. */
> +static irqreturn_t pulse_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = dev_id;
> +
> +	/* Avoid possible overflow */
> +	if (atomic_read(&ctx->pulses) < 100000)
> +		atomic_inc(&ctx->pulses);
> +

100000 * 60 * 1000 = 6,000,000,000, which is already above 32 bit,
so you still get the overflow.

Any limit would have to be below (0xffffffff / (60 * sample_ms))
for the maximum expected value of sample_ms.

You could select a working limit, such as 32768 (that is just as arbitrary
as 100,000, but at least it works up to sample_ms above 2,000), or check
for overflow when calculating rpm.

> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static void sample_timer(struct timer_list *t)
> +{
> +	struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = from_timer(ctx, t, rpm_timer);
> +	int pulses, sample_ms;
> +
> +	pulses = atomic_read(&ctx->pulses);
> +	atomic_sub(pulses, &ctx->pulses);
> +	sample_ms = ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), ctx->sample_start);
> +	ctx->rpm = pulses * 60 * sample_ms / 1000 / ctx->pulses_per_revolution;
> +
> +	ctx->sample_start = ktime_get();
> +	mod_timer(&ctx->rpm_timer, jiffies + HZ);
> +}
> +
>   static int  __set_pwm(struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx, unsigned long pwm)
>   {
>   	unsigned long period;
> @@ -100,15 +136,49 @@ static ssize_t pwm_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>   	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", ctx->pwm_value);
>   }
>   
> +static ssize_t rpm_show(struct device *dev,
> +			struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", ctx->rpm);
> +}
>   
>   static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR_RW(pwm1, pwm, 0);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR_RO(fan1_input, rpm, 0);
>   
>   static struct attribute *pwm_fan_attrs[] = {
>   	&sensor_dev_attr_pwm1.dev_attr.attr,
> +	&sensor_dev_attr_fan1_input.dev_attr.attr,
>   	NULL,
>   };
>   
> -ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(pwm_fan);
> +static umode_t pwm_fan_attrs_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *a,
> +				     int n)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = container_of(kobj, struct device, kobj);
> +	struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct device_attribute *devattr;
> +
> +	/* Hide fan_input in case no interrupt is available  */
> +	devattr = container_of(a, struct device_attribute, attr);
> +	if (devattr == &sensor_dev_attr_fan1_input.dev_attr) {
> +		if (ctx->irq < 0)
> +			return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return a->mode;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group pwm_fan_group = {
> +	.attrs = pwm_fan_attrs,
> +	.is_visible = pwm_fan_attrs_visible,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group *pwm_fan_groups[] = {
> +	&pwm_fan_group,
> +	NULL,
> +};
>   
>   /* thermal cooling device callbacks */
>   static int pwm_fan_get_max_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
> @@ -261,6 +331,32 @@ static int pwm_fan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		goto err_reg_disable;
>   	}
>   
> +	timer_setup(&ctx->rpm_timer, sample_timer, 0);
> +
> +	if (of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "pulses-per-revolution",
> +				 &ctx->pulses_per_revolution)) {
> +		ctx->pulses_per_revolution = 2;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!ctx->pulses_per_revolution) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pulses-per-revolution can't be zero.\n");
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto err_pwm_disable;
> +	}
> +
> +	atomic_set(&ctx->pulses, 0);

Already initialized with 0.

> +	ctx->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> +	if (ctx->irq >= 0) {

I have seen other patches recently, changing this check to > 0.
I never know what a valid irq is, but it may be prudent to change this to > 0
(and the check in is_visible to <= 0).

Either case, the function can return -EPROBE_DEFER, which should be handled
and not be ignored.

> +		ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, ctx->irq, pulse_handler, 0,
> +				       pdev->name, ctx);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't get interrupt working.\n");
> +			goto err_pwm_disable;
> +		}
> +		ctx->sample_start = ktime_get();
> +		mod_timer(&ctx->rpm_timer, jiffies + HZ);
> +	}
> +
>   	hwmon = devm_hwmon_device_register_with_groups(&pdev->dev, "pwmfan",
>   						       ctx, pwm_fan_groups);
>   	if (IS_ERR(hwmon)) {

del_timer_sync() here ?

> @@ -306,6 +402,8 @@ static int pwm_fan_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>   
>   	thermal_cooling_device_unregister(ctx->cdev);
> +	del_timer_sync(&ctx->rpm_timer);
> +
>   	if (ctx->pwm_value)
>   		pwm_disable(ctx->pwm);
>   
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists