[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1691b160-5558-d4c3-afed-5773e115c5aa@web.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 17:17:46 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>,
Wen Yang <yellowriver2010@...mail.com>,
Cheng Shengyu <cheng.shengyu@....com.cn>,
cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device()
> Applied to linux-kbuild.
A questionable development version was integrated for this SmPL script.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci?id=da9cfb87a44da61f2403c4312916befcb6b6d7e8
https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/201902191014156680299@zte.com.cn/
Now I am curious on how such a source code analysis approach will be
improved further.
Which changes will get the desired acceptance?
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1053979/
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1553321671-27749-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn/
https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2019-March/005679.html
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists