lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190323164810.GE9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 23 Mar 2019 18:48:10 +0200
From:   "andriy.shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "zhuchangchun@...e.com" <zhuchangchun@...e.com>
Cc:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linus.walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        hendychu <hendychu@...yun.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: intel: Implements gpio free function

On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 02:51:52PM +0800, zhuchangchun@...e.com wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 11:14:14AM +0800, zhuchangchun@...e.com wrote:

> >    From above,you can kown when you export a GPIO ,it will do request,
> >
> >    and there will set TX and RX register at the time same time.
> >
> >    when you try to set direction in and set value, TX register value can
> >    roll back
> >
> >    the value,but RX register was not set, so who will set RX value back??
>  
> I think you are looking at some older code. There is now function
> __intel_gpio_set_direction() that is supposed to set both buffers
> depending on the direction. It was introduced with commit 17fab473693e
> ("pinctrl: intel: Set pin direction properly").
> 
> 
> --> Yes ,I see the latest master branch, the __intel_gpio_set_direction will
> set RX and TX, but I still think we need to implement free function,cause
> it will help many other engineers,especailly for some manufactories use some
> module,and this modules embeded its own driver but not can be modified,
> if they want use the gpio control the module, they may meet the same problem.

What problem?
Is it reproducible on latest vanilla kernel?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ