[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190324033747.GA7697@icarus>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 12:38:29 +0900
From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, bgolaszewski@...libre.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 10/10] thermal: intel: intel_soc_dts_iosf: Utilize
for_each_set_clump8 macro
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 09:02:43PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 09:32:57PM +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro, and the bitmap_set_value8 and
> > bitmap_get_value8 functions, where appropriate. In addition, remove the
> > now unnecessary temp_mask and temp_shift members of the
> > intel_soc_dts_sensor_entry structure.
>
> One comment below, otherwise
> Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Thanks!
Thank you for testing out the patch. I'll fix the bug your pointed out
and add the Tested-by line.
I have a couple minor comments below.
>
> >
> > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/intel/intel_soc_dts_iosf.c | 29 +++++++++++++---------
> > drivers/thermal/intel/intel_soc_dts_iosf.h | 2 --
> > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_soc_dts_iosf.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_soc_dts_iosf.c
> > index e0813dfaa278..b66f554670f7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_soc_dts_iosf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_soc_dts_iosf.c
> > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> >
> > #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> >
> > +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > @@ -111,6 +112,7 @@ static int update_trip_temp(struct intel_soc_dts_sensor_entry *dts,
> > {
> > int status;
> > u32 temp_out;
> > + unsigned long update_ptps;
> > u32 out;
> > u32 store_ptps;
> > u32 store_ptmc;
> > @@ -129,8 +131,9 @@ static int update_trip_temp(struct intel_soc_dts_sensor_entry *dts,
> > if (status)
> > return status;
> >
> > - out = (store_ptps & ~(0xFF << (thres_index * 8)));
> > - out |= (temp_out & 0xFF) << (thres_index * 8);
> > + update_ptps = store_ptps;
> > + bitmap_set_value8(&update_ptps, 32, temp_out & 0xFF, thres_index * 8);
I chose to hardcode a bitmap width of 32 here because that is the width
of the store_ptps variables, but I don't think we necessarily use all 32
bits here. Would the actual width of store_ptps be the number of
writable trip count bits (writable_trip_count * 8)?
> > + out = update_ptps;
> > status = iosf_mbi_write(BT_MBI_UNIT_PMC, MBI_REG_WRITE,
> > SOC_DTS_OFFSET_PTPS, out);
> > if (status)
> > @@ -232,6 +235,7 @@ static int sys_get_curr_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tzd,
> > u32 out;
> > struct intel_soc_dts_sensor_entry *dts;
> > struct intel_soc_dts_sensors *sensors;
> > + unsigned long temp_raw;
> >
> > dts = tzd->devdata;
> > sensors = dts->sensors;
> > @@ -240,7 +244,8 @@ static int sys_get_curr_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tzd,
> > if (status)
> > return status;
> >
> > - out = (out & dts->temp_mask) >> dts->temp_shift;
> > + temp_raw = out;
> > + out = bitmap_get_value8(&temp_raw, 32, dts->id * 8);
Same question as above: what is the maximum bitmap width here if not 32?
William Breathitt Gray
> > out -= SOC_DTS_TJMAX_ENCODING;
> > *temp = sensors->tj_max - out * 1000;
> >
> > @@ -290,10 +295,13 @@ static int add_dts_thermal_zone(int id, struct intel_soc_dts_sensor_entry *dts,
> > {
> > char name[10];
> > int trip_count = 0;
> > + int writable_trip_count = 0;
> > int trip_mask = 0;
> > u32 store_ptps;
> > int ret;
> > - int i;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > + unsigned long trip;
> > + unsigned long ptps;
> >
> > /* Store status to restor on exit */
> > ret = iosf_mbi_read(BT_MBI_UNIT_PMC, MBI_REG_READ,
> > @@ -302,11 +310,10 @@ static int add_dts_thermal_zone(int id, struct intel_soc_dts_sensor_entry *dts,
> > goto err_ret;
> >
> > dts->id = id;
> > - dts->temp_mask = 0x00FF << (id * 8);
> > - dts->temp_shift = id * 8;
> > if (notification_support) {
> > trip_count = min(SOC_MAX_DTS_TRIPS, trip_cnt);
> > - trip_mask = BIT(trip_count - read_only_trip_cnt) - 1;
> > + writable_trip_count = trip_count - read_only_trip_cnt;
> > + trip_mask = GENMASK(writable_trip_count - 1, 0);
> > }
> >
> > /* Check if the writable trip we provide is not used by BIOS */
> > @@ -315,11 +322,9 @@ static int add_dts_thermal_zone(int id, struct intel_soc_dts_sensor_entry *dts,
> > if (ret)
> > trip_mask = 0;
> > else {
> > - for (i = 0; i < trip_count; ++i) {
> > - if (trip_mask & BIT(i))
> > - if (store_ptps & (0xff << (i * 8)))
> > - trip_mask &= ~BIT(i);
> > - }
> > + ptps = store_ptps;
> > + for_each_set_clump8(i, trip, ptps, writable_trip_count * 8)
>
> It seems you didn't notice gcc warnings, the ptps should be pointer, i.e. &ptps.
> After changing here manually seems working.
>
> > + trip_mask &= ~BIT(i / 8);
> > }
> > dts->trip_mask = trip_mask;
> > dts->trip_count = trip_count;
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_soc_dts_iosf.h b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_soc_dts_iosf.h
> > index 625e37bf93dc..d0362d7acdef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_soc_dts_iosf.h
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_soc_dts_iosf.h
> > @@ -33,8 +33,6 @@ struct intel_soc_dts_sensors;
> >
> > struct intel_soc_dts_sensor_entry {
> > int id;
> > - u32 temp_mask;
> > - u32 temp_shift;
> > u32 store_status;
> > u32 trip_mask;
> > u32 trip_count;
> > --
> > 2.21.0
> >
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists