[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190324121208.GA24213@bharath12345-Inspiron-5559>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 17:42:08 +0530
From: Bharath Vedartham <linux.bhar@...il.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jfrederich@...il.com, dsd@...top.org,
jon.nettleton@...il.com
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC/PATCH] staging: olpc_dcon: Use WARN_ON instead of BUG_ON
This is with respect to a checkpatch.pl CHECK: "Avoid crashing the
kernel. Use WARN_ON instead of BUG_ON". But I maybe wrong here. Is a
kernel crash desired if olpc_board_at_least(olpc_board(0xc2)) fails,
will there be inconsistent results if execution continues?
Signed-off-by: Bharath Vedartham <linux.bhar@...il.com>
---
drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.c b/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.c
index 6b714f7..900baab7 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.c
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int dcon_bus_stabilize(struct dcon_priv *dcon, int is_powered_down)
}
if (x < 0) {
pr_err("unable to stabilize dcon's smbus, reasserting power and praying.\n");
- BUG_ON(olpc_board_at_least(olpc_board(0xc2)));
+ WARN_ON(olpc_board_at_least(olpc_board(0xc2)));
pm = 0;
olpc_ec_cmd(EC_DCON_POWER_MODE, &pm, 1, NULL, 0);
msleep(100);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists