lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 24 Mar 2019 09:44:04 -0500
From:   "Serge E. Hallyn" <>
To:     Daniel Colascione <>
Cc:     Christian Brauner <>,
        Joel Fernandes <>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <>,
        Steven Rostedt <>,
        Sultan Alsawaf <>,
        Tim Murray <>,
        Michal Hocko <>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
        Arve Hjønnevåg <>,
        Todd Kjos <>,
        Martijn Coenen <>,
        Ingo Molnar <>,
        Peter Zijlstra <>,
        LKML <>,
        "open list:ANDROID DRIVERS" <>,
        linux-mm <>,
        kernel-team <>,
        Oleg Nesterov <>,
        Andy Lutomirski <>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <>,
        Kees Cook <>
Subject: Re: pidfd design

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:29:31PM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:52 AM Christian Brauner <> wrote:
> > I really want to see Joel's pidfd_wait() patchset and have more people
> > review the actual code.
> Sure. But it's also unpleasant to have people write code and then have
> to throw it away due to guessing incorrectly about unclear
> requirements.

No, it is not.  It is not unpleasant.  And it is useful.  It is the best way to
identify and resolve those incorrect guesses and unclear requirements.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists