[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKYH1yNE1vjppWirn13O0HawKCmveDAaHpgYuFxCwp_hw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 16:20:53 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Ryan Case <ryandcase@...omium.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
Alexis Ballier <aballier@...too.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Akash Gajjar <Akash_Gajjar@...tor.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: ARM: dts: rockchip: Add
rk3288-veyron-jerry rev 10-15
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:59 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> As far as I can tell/remember rev10 was originally created to support
> making a SKU of jerry that had a different LCD. rev11-rev15 were
> added to give some wiggle room for future builds. Downstream has a
> separate device tree for rev10-rev15 (compared to rev3-rev7) with the
> expectation that differences relating to the LCD would be accounted
> for there but nothing was ever added to the rev10-rev15 making it
> identical to the rev3-rev7 one.
>
> It's likely nothing actually shipped with rev10-rev15 but they are
> listed in the downstream kernel's device tree and it seems like it
> should add a little safety if we match them here just in case
> something actually shipped with one of these revisions and that device
> will break if we don't claim support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists