lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 24 Mar 2019 16:20:53 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Ryan Case <ryandcase@...omium.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        Alexis Ballier <aballier@...too.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Akash Gajjar <Akash_Gajjar@...tor.com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: ARM: dts: rockchip: Add
 rk3288-veyron-jerry rev 10-15

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:59 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> As far as I can tell/remember rev10 was originally created to support
> making a SKU of jerry that had a different LCD.  rev11-rev15 were
> added to give some wiggle room for future builds.  Downstream has a
> separate device tree for rev10-rev15 (compared to rev3-rev7) with the
> expectation that differences relating to the LCD would be accounted
> for there but nothing was ever added to the rev10-rev15 making it
> identical to the rev3-rev7 one.
>
> It's likely nothing actually shipped with rev10-rev15 but they are
> listed in the downstream kernel's device tree and it seems like it
> should add a little safety if we match them here just in case
> something actually shipped with one of these revisions and that device
> will break if we don't claim support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
>
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ