linux-kernel - Re: [tip:ras/core 2/2] drivers/ras/debugfs.c:9:5: error: redefinition of 'ras_userspace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 24 Mar 2019 19:56:21 -0400
From:   "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
To:     kbuild-all@...org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tipbuild@...or.com, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [tip:ras/core 2/2] drivers/ras/debugfs.c:9:5: error: redefinition of 'ras_userspace_consumers'

On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 06:41:49 +0800, kbuild test robot said:

> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git ras/core
> head:   56baf8bd6c92819b1d89210fbfac2c6327a1271b
> commit: 56baf8bd6c92819b1d89210fbfac2c6327a1271b [2/2] ras/debugfs: Fix -Wmissing-prototypes warnings
> config: x86_64-randconfig-x003-201912 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0

OK.  Now to figure out why gcc-7.3 on Debian complains and gcc-9.0.1 on Fedora
is perfectly happy with the patch, or if there's something I didn't expect in
that randconfig, or if there's some other skew between what the test robot tree
has in it, and next-20190318 (the last linux-next I built, which didn't
complain...)