[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1553546236.5561.7.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:37:16 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4a 1/2] selftests/kexec: make tests independent of IMA
being enabled
On Mon, 2019-03-25 at 16:09 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi Mimi
> On 03/22/19 at 03:35pm, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > Verify IMA is enabled before failing tests or emitting irrelevant
> > messages. Also, don't skip the test if signatures are not required.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > Dave, if this patch resolves the outstanding issues, I can fold these
> > changes into the original patches. (Reminder, these patches will need to
> > be updated to support the "lockdown" patch set.)
>
> They looks good to me, thanks for the update
I've folded the kexec_file_load changes into the kexec_file_load test.
The remaining kexec_load change is left as a separate patch, since it
is dependent on the ikconfig change.
> Feel free to add my reviewed-by, I did some tests although not cover all
> ima cases.
Thanks! Is this meant as a general "reviewed-by" for all of the
patches or just this specific one?
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists