linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] mfd: ti-lmu: Remove LM3532 backlight driver references

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c950b7d3-eeb1-2dc2-b732-3a40d5b3a8b7@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Mar 2019 22:11:00 +0100
From:   Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, robh+dt@...nel.org, pavel@....cz,
        tony@...mide.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mfd: ti-lmu: Remove LM3532 backlight driver
 references

On 3/25/19 8:53 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Mar 2019, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> 
>> Hi Lee,
>>
>> Can we have your ack for this going via LED tree, please?
> 
> Patch looks okay.
> 
> You can take it through the LED, but if you do I will need you to send
> me a pull-request to a minimised immutable branch please.
> 
> If you cannot do this, I can apply the set and provide the same to
> you.
> 
> If you choose the former:
> 
>    Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> 
> Please let me know what you decide
> 

I've been exposing integration branches in the past, but after Linus'
message [0] I have my doubts now. I wonder if it wouldn't make more
sense if I just took the patches, and you'd cherry-pick them only in
case such a need occurs. This way we would avoid this whole merge
noise, which in an optimistic and very plausible case will not be needed
at all.

[0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/19/1104

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski